Search for: "Does 1-4 v. United States Attorney Office" Results 321 - 340 of 1,968
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2010, 8:08 am by Leslie Sammis
United States, 487 U.S. 533, 536 (1988) (officers who illegally entered warehouse and observed bags of marijuana could not rely on their knowledge of the marijuana in support of application for warrant). [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am by Aaron
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/01/04/09-50113.pdf United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:50 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
This is an issue of exceptional importance, and we conclude it is an appropriate useof our discretion to decide the issue over a challenge ofwaiver.The big issue:The issue, therefore, iswhether APJs are “Officers of the United States” and if so,whether they are inferior officers or principal officers; thelatter requiring appointment by the President as opposedto the Secretary of Commerce. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
The United States also has a concept of double patenting to avoid multiple patents on the same invention. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:39 am by Wanda
[All of the facts in this post come from the 11th Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 7:56 am
Leah Durant is the owner and principal attorney of the Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:36 am by Sang-Min Kim
“Though their rhetoric and policy were intentionally misleading and purposefully damaging to our democracy, based on our initial review, our office does not believe this meets the legal standards for forgery,” the attorney general’s office said in a statement. [read post]