Search for: "Marty Lawing" Results 321 - 340 of 2,182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  He told the 9th Circuit this was the test too in Sid & Marty Krofft. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  At Balkinization, Marty Ledereman's post on the history of congressional investigations of presidential activity. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
There is an intuitive response to this argument, as Marty Lederman pointed out: perhaps the Constitution simply imposes no obligation to impeach, even under the most extreme of circumstances. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
Simply eliminating one sentence—the mandate—would save the law. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:59 pm by Unknown
  When signed into law by Governor Hickenlooper, this law removed the provision above, making the law clear that any handicap parking spot, whether on public or private lot, must allow handicap parking. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:15 am by SHG
” A black law prof in a mostly white school. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 7:54 am by Rick Hills
Mushy doctrine typically leads to institutional flip-flops — that is, inconsistent use of the doctrine to invalidate laws disliked by the swing voter on the SCOTUS. [read post]
30 May 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Marty Rouse, national field director for the Human Rights Campaign, applauded Maine’s lawmakers for “their leadership in taking up this important issue. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:10 pm by Martin H. Orlick
For more information about ADA compliance and defense, contact Marty Orlick at 415.984.9667 or morlick@jmbm.com. [read post]
More than just an interesting story, Marty Orlick explains how this might affect current and future ADA litigation. [read post]
28 May 2019, 5:49 am by Geoff Cockrell
The moderator was Kayla McCann Marty, Attorney at McGuireWoods LLP. 1. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:08 am by Jack Goldsmith
The argument drew disagreement from Benjamin Wittes, Andrew Kent and Marty Lederman, which in turn provoked a response by Josh Blackman, who holds views similar to mine. [read post]
22 May 2019, 3:34 pm by Jonathan Shaub
The McGahn case poses a difficult but pure question of constitutional law, and there are neither privilege claims to adjudicate nor documents to review. [read post]
17 May 2019, 11:41 am by Josh Blackman
Recently, Benjamin Wittes, Andrew Kent, Marty Lederman and others have begun to do the work that Mueller did not. [read post]
16 May 2019, 8:49 am by Erika Frank
The court reasoned that California law has a strong presumption for the ABC test to apply retroactively. [read post]
4 May 2019, 7:12 pm by Tom Smith
Georgetown Law professor Marty Lederman wrote at Just Security: “[T]he first huge and striking problem with Barr’s memo is that he unjustifiably makes countless assumptions about what Mueller is doing…From all that appears, Barr was simply conjuring from whole cloth a preposterously long set of assumptions about how Special Counsel Mueller was adopting extreme and unprecedented-within-DOJ views about every pertinent question and investigatory decision. [read post]