Search for: "P. v. Sun"
Results 321 - 340
of 454
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2011, 6:14 am
Matter of Okslen Acupuncture, P.C. v Cuomo Poor Zuppa. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 5:07 pm
The “Sun – Tabloid Lies” blog has an interesting post on Rebekah Brooks campaign on the Baby P and “The Libelling of Sylvia Henry” In the Courts On Monday 20 June 2011, Mr Justice Vos heard the application for third party disclosure by the claimants in the “Phone Interception” litigation. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:19 am
Wainwright (right to counsel), Wong Sun v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:50 pm
The “Sun” also published an apology to Ms Henry, indicating that it had agreed to pay compensation. [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:30 pm
There was a high profile media campaign, including a petition by The Sun newspaper, to have her sacked. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm
Forasol v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 4:33 am
Vancouver Sun January 12 2011. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:23 am
When studies look at many outcomes, or many subgroups, chance alone will lead to results that have p-values less than the usual level for statistical significance (p < 0.05). [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:51 am
The criminal case is U.S. v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:43 pm
Van Camp v Van Camp (1921) 53 CA 17, 199 P 885; Pereira v Pereira (1909) 156 C 1, 103 P 488. 8. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
Wednesday, April 27, 2011, the Hawaii Supreme Court accepted cert in Kee Sun Kim v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 11:58 pm
P. [26(c)(1)(G)]. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:22 pm
But the High Court has already ruled in a similar case (where protesters chanted “burn in hell”, “baby killers” and “rapists” at British soldiers) that prosecution under the public order act was legitimate, and that freedom of speech will not have been impaired by ““ruling …out” threatening, abusive or insulting speech” (Lord Reid, in Brutus v Cozens [1973] AC 854, at p. 862). [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:31 am
But the high court has already ruled in a similar case (where protesters chanted “burn in hell”, “baby killers” and “rapists” at British soldiers) that prosecution under the public order act was legitimate, and that freedom of speech will not have been impaired by ““ruling …out” threatening, abusive or insulting speech” (Lord Reid, in Brutus v Cozens [1973] AC 854, at p. 862). [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:46 am
Assemblyman V. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
Has the sun set on solar rights? [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:30 am
Macias v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Gary P. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:36 am
(see chart below World Wide Ownership of US Patents 2010) Top-50 US Patent Assignees in 2010 (As reported by IFI) International Business Machines Corp 5896 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd (Korea) 4551 Microsoft Corp 3094 Canon K K (Japan) 2552 Panasonic Corp (Japan) 2482 Toshiba Corp (Japan) 2246 Sony Corp (Japan) 2150 Intel Corp 1653 LG Electronics Inc (Korea) 1490 Hewlett-Packard Development Co L P 1480 Hitachi Ltd (Japan) 1460 Seiko Epson Corp… [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:35 am
In 2010, U.S. companies obtained 50.3% of granted patents, compared with 49% in 2009.High-tech patents also dominated areas with the heaviest new patenting activity:Multiplex Communications (US class 370) -- 3.3% of totalSolid-State Devices and Transistors (US class 257) -- 3.1%Semiconductors (US class 438) -- 2.7%Drug Compositions (US class 514) -- 2.1% Data Processing and File Management (US class 707) -- 2%Computers and Processing Systems (US class 709) -- 2%… [read post]
