Search for: "People v Connor"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2009, 4:59 am
Cir. 1992) (holding that, for purposes of Fourth Amendment, retention of defendant's driver's license during police questioning constituted seizure); People v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 9:07 am
Ondricko v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm
She argued that Article 8 imposed on the State a positive obligation to facilitate the gypsy way of life (Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27238/95, BAILII: [2001] ECHR 43, ECHR 2001 I and Connors v. the United Kingdom, no. 66746/01, BAILII: [2004] ECHR 223, 27 May 2004) and in granting such a wide-ranging injunction the authorities were acting in violation of this obligation. 21. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:22 am
Briefly: Court watchers continue to comment on retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s recent remarks to the Chicago Tribune in which she expressed doubts about the Court’s cert. grant in Bush v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:16 am
At madisonian.net, Michael Risch discusses last week’s arguments in Alice Corporation v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
To be sure, justices are people, and people have biases, usually in favor of their own groups. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 2:15 pm
Connor and Tennessee v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 7:04 am
Justice O’Connor’s opinion in Grutter v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 5:49 pm
It’s funny what people will put out as satire and art nowadays—though, I don’t have any thing wrong with it. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 6:19 am
The blog of Burnham & Borokhov, PLLC, analyzes the petitioner’s opening brief and the arguments of several amicus briefs in Van Buren v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 7:08 am
Neal Devins is the Sandra Day O’Connor Professor of Law at the College of William and Mary. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:26 am
In Rehberg v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:47 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has issued its ruling in Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:30 am
In an earlier post, Josh noted that Texas v. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 8:18 pm
In Bentley v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:30 am
In 2003, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor relied on Powell’s diversity rationale when deciding Grutter v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:12 am
Supreme Court precedent is flatly contrary, see Jones v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
The flag-burning decision, Texas v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 2:06 pm
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor first suggested this change in legal doctrine in her 1983 dissenting opinion in City of Akron v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
Justices Cupp and O’Connor mustered a somewhat pained defense of the decision, and the court hasn’t flat-out overruled a prior case since its ill-advised decision five years ago in Westfield v. [read post]
