Search for: "Plaintiffs"
Results 321 - 340
of 203,031
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2024, 8:17 am
This post summarizes published criminal and related decisions of interest from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in April 2024. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:14 am
Justices Agree to Reconsider Longstanding Statutory Employer Defense Precedent”: Riley Brennan of The Legal Intelligencer has this report about a case in which I am serving as appellate counsel for the plaintiff-appellant. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:03 am
This case before the Supreme Court asks what happens when someone files a motion to compel arbitration after the plaintiff filed suit in federal court. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:00 am
FRAMENT OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:00 am
FRAMENT OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. [read post]
21 May 2024, 6:51 am
” “‘Plaintiffs in this action, a handful of alleged FTX customers, purport to bring claims against Sullivan & Cromwell to recover the same damages for which they are already being compensated through the bankruptcy process,”’ the firm said, asking a federal judge in Florida to dismiss the lawsuit. [read post]
21 May 2024, 6:46 am
It lowers the bar Title VII plaintiffs must meet. [read post]
21 May 2024, 6:00 am
” Without much explanation, the court determined that the plaintiff failed to allege that the defendants had “used the plaintiff's name, portrait, picture, or voice within this state for advertising purposes. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
This point is not innocuous, as the plaintiffs in several lawsuits brought against AI companies did not have access to the content of the training datasets and could therefore only assume that their works had been used by AI companies on the basis of the outputs generated by their AI tools. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:54 am
Consequently, the trial court entered a judgment awarding the plaintiff zero damages and allowing the defendant to recover her costs from the plaintiff. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:00 am
Employee Terminated Upon Return From Medical Leave The case of Krmpotic v Thunder Bay Electronics Limited involved the plaintiff employee (“DK”) , who began working for Thunder Bay Electronics Limited (“TBEL”) as a carpenter in their maintenance department in 1987. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:00 am
Employee Terminated Upon Return From Medical Leave The case of Krmpotic v Thunder Bay Electronics Limited involved the plaintiff employee (“DK”) , who began working for Thunder Bay Electronics Limited (“TBEL”) as a carpenter in their maintenance department in 1987. [read post]
21 May 2024, 4:41 am
Reasonable diligence/justifiable reliance The Court excused Plaintiffs’ failure to contact Dewbre and others to find out what had happened and to never hire a lawyer, CPA, or oil and gas consultant to look into their investment. [read post]
21 May 2024, 4:05 am
Suit was filed last week in a Florida federal district court by a Chabad rabbi and related plaintiffs charging a Homeowners' Association with religious discrimination in violation of state and federal Fair Housing Acts and civil rights protections. [read post]
21 May 2024, 4:00 am
” The Federal Courts Rules also have a provision that allows a defendant not in default to seek to have a case dismissed if there has been ‘undue delay’ by the plaintiff. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:00 pm
This case involved Plaintiffs who sued Ameriprise Financial for negligent and fraudulent misrepresentation relative to a life insurance policy. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:00 pm
”In this instance, the AT2 noted that the defendant argued that it was not the manufacturer of the product and that J.L. failed to establish “causation” – that the defendant was somehow responsible for the injury by way of its acts or failure to act, and that the injuries were the foreseeable result of defendant’s misconduct.Given that backdrop, the AT2 ended up affirming the dismissal.Did that plaintiff’s case have no teeth? [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
Wilmer Hale attorney authors give the lowdown on recent data breach decisions and what “risk of future injury” courts are finding sufficient to confer standing on plaintiffs. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:05 pm
In Nortel, the court focused on the relationship between the plaintiffs’ transactions and the allegedly fraudulent conduct, holding that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring a claim under Section 10(b). [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:09 pm
., Plaintiff alleged that he received an unsolicited call from a third-party agency inquiring as to Plaintiff’s interest in automotive insurance. [read post]
