Search for: "Roberts v. United States" Results 321 - 340 of 9,618
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Section 3 says the following:No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution… [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am by Alan Neff
It is notable that, as a young DOJ lawyer, Roberts opposed this amendment, which overruled Mobile v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” It wasn’t until 1938 that the Court, in a footnote to a case, United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am by Eric Segall
United States, in which the Could upheld the forced relocation of all people of Japanese descent on the West Coast just because of their ancestry. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:51 am
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., Defendant (Complaint, United States District Court for the... [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 3:17 am by SHG
The trial of the United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 1:20 pm by Josh Blackman
The purpose of the Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was to remove the power to select United States Senators from political party bosses. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am by Josh Blackman
" Chief Justice Roberts wrote two election-law decisions this term, Allen v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Once again, preferences and politics, not law, were the coins of the realm at the United States Supreme Court.Despite the conservative justices' rhetorical embrace of public meaning originalism, the reality is that constitutional litigation almost always involves the balancing of important and conflicting values. 303 Creative v. [read post]