Search for: "Roche v. Roche" Results 321 - 340 of 925
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
And now, here is a legal first, straight from the pen (well, keyboard) of our Mr Justice Arnold in joined cases Actavis Group hf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA)/Medis ehf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) [2012] EWHC 3316 (Pat) on whether the English Courts have jurisdiction over issues of infringement of foreign-designated patents. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
The notice requirement, itself, had been confirmed in Frits Loendersloot v George Ballantine & Sons Ltd [1977] ECR I-227. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 1:31 am by GuestPost
The question as to when life begins has been examined by the Supreme Court in Roche v Roche. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 3:32 pm
Furthermore, we conclude that, because "the analysis employed by this [C]ourt in the prior appeal no longer reflects the current state of the law, the doctrine of law of the case should not be invoked to preclude reconsideration of" Charter Oak's motion to dismiss plaintiff's claim for compensatory damages (Szajna v Rand, 131 AD2d 840, 840 [1987]; see Foley v Roche, 86 AD2d 887 [1982], lv denied 56 NY2d 507 [1982]). [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm by Richard Renner
., New Futures Trading International Corporation and Henry Roche, U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm by Bexis
  Id.To get around TwIqbal, the plaintiffs in Ali trotted out Hofts v. [read post]