Search for: "Sees v. Sees"
Results 321 - 340
of 121,621
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2017, 3:33 pm
If you'd like to catch up and read some of the news coverage and court documents, see the Washington v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 1:15 pm
BAILII has just published the intriging judgment in Iran v Berend [2007] EWHC 132 (QB), which was handed down last Thursday (1 February 2007). [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 11:25 am
See Bad Gatekeeping or Missed Opportunity – Allen v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 9:59 pm
Eli Lilly & Co. last week, Chief Judge Michel asked Lilly's counsel whether Lilly had preserved the written description issue by timely objecting to District Court Judge Zobel's jury instruction (see "Ariad v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 9:57 pm
Sweet of the Southern District of New York granting partial summary judgment that the claims of several patents on BRCA1 were invalid as encompassing non-statutory subject matter (see "Myriad Appeals AMP v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 3:16 pm
Bucking the growing trend to use anonymous juries (see Blagojevich trial and terrorism trials), the Oregon Supreme Court today overturned the conviction of a sex offender because the jurors that decided his case were anonymous (Oregon v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 5:41 am
But we’ll have to wait and see how that shakes out. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:51 am
"We can expect to see more executions," Hood said. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:23 am
See Pippins v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 10:18 am
See Crouse v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:59 pm
Actavis, Inc. and Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 3:56 pm
In Hewlett-Packard v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
CFTC v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 11:12 am
See Arita-Deras v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 1:02 am
Like all good news sources (see, for example, here and here), I am bound to report that the decree nisi in the case of The Nation's Sweetheart v Cashley Cole is due to be pronounced in the Principal Registry this morning. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:05 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:45 am
Since the underlying legal malpractice claim is dismissed, the claim for disgorgement must be dismissed as well (see Cambridge Capital Real Estate Invs., LLC v Archstone Enter. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:22 am
I reported briefly on Kernott v Jones in this post, shortly after the judgment was published (for a far more comprehensive report see this post by Nearly Legal). [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 7:21 am
In its second intellectual property appeal (the first being Lucasfilm v Ainsworth [2011] UKSC 39 see my case note "Lucasfilm v Ansoworth The Supreme Court's First IP Appeal" 31 July 2011 IP/IT Update) the United Kingdom Supreme Court had to consider the way in which the requirement of industrial applicability extends to a patent for biological material. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:20 am
See also post 1, post 2, and post 3.One curiosity about State v. [read post]
