Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 321 - 340 of 4,045
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2017, 4:27 am by INFORRM
Extending liability in such cases, the Court of Appeals has held, does not violate the constitutional protections of freedom of speech (Spahn v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:12 pm by FDABlog HPM
Moreover, the California Court of Appeal concluded that “the Cipro agreements do not violate the Cartwright Act under [a] rule-of-reason analysis or the analysis the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held to be applicable to settlements of Hatch-Waxman litigation in [Valley Drug Co. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:04 am
 Since NCAA member institutions appear to have validated President Mark Emmert’s unilateral punishment (through the NCAA Executive Committee and Division I Board of Directors), and Penn State consented, affected parties were left with very little recourse. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:04 am
 Since NCAA member institutions appear to have validated President Mark Emmert’s unilateral punishment (through the NCAA Executive Committee and Division I Board of Directors), and Penn State consented, affected parties were left with very little recourse. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 3:02 am
Since the New York Court of Appeals' holdings in Great Canal Realty Corp. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 1:53 am by INFORRM
” The appeal was unanimously allowed by the Court of Appeal (the President of the Family Division, Sir James Munby, Lord Justice McFarlane and Lord Justice Clark). [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 4:42 pm by The Complex Litigator
 And, in a most interesting twist, the appellate division tackling this question is very same division that decided Parris v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 3:48 pm by H. Scott Leviant
(July 3, 2018), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Six), upheld a trial court order declining to enforce an arbitration agreement. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
It is unanimous in affirming the Appellate Division’s rejection of Trump’s state law grounds for appeal. [read post]
April 25, 2017), the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has joined the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals and other courts in holding that athletes are not employees entitled to minimum wage and overtime time pay. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 4:32 pm
 Today, the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Three) offers a reminder that such a choice can have substantial consequences, holding, in Las Lomas Land Company, LLC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:02 am by Dan Bressler
Court of Appeals Issues Rare Decision on Revoking Consent to Conflict Waiver” — “Earlier this year, Division I of the Washington Court of Appeals issued a decision touching on an area of the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) that is rarely litigated: revoking consent to conflict waivers. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 4:18 am by New York Civil Law
The appeal concerned the trial court's denial of the plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment on liability concerning a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1). [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 4:18 am by New York Civil Law
The appeal concerned the trial court's denial of the plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment on liability concerning a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1). [read post]