Search for: "State v. David A. Miller"
Results 321 - 340
of 683
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
In Fisher v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 2:00 am
” But on a separate issue, he did not state a False Claims Act whistleblower retaliation claim against individual town officials because a 2009 amendment did not expand the FCA to provide individual liability (Howell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:38 am
Supreme Court case Miller v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Here, Grutter v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 12:41 am
He refers to R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, noting it is consistent with the UK Government position. 1449: David Johnston QC refers to the Fixed Term Parliaments Act 2011 in accordance with which dissolution must take place. [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Indeed, in Gratz v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 6:43 pm
We then move from international criminal courts to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights with Lisl Brunner’s piece which explores the recent Gelman v. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
” (p. 60) Martin v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 7:14 am
Florida (08-7412) and Sullivan v. [read post]
8 Mar 2025, 12:24 pm
Relying on R v Miller II, a UK Supreme Court case invalidating a 2019 prorogation of the UK Parliament by then Prime Minister Boris Johnson, the applicants maintained that by “preventing Parliament’s ability to carry out its constitutional functions,” Trudeau exceeded his authority in proroguing the Parliament. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Div., Dep’t of Human Res. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
On 23 March 2017 Sir David Eady heard an application in the case of EZE Group Ltd v Taylor Marshall Ltd. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 6:30 am
David S. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s announcement in New York Times v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 10:48 am
Miller's opinion yesterday in Goodson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 8:40 am
The unanimous decision in Miller v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:12 am
Hudson, State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 9:15 pm
Judge David Miller may be facing off with Attorney Mauricio Padilla if Padilla decides to pay the qualifying fee.There are four open seats and each one has a contested race. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
And, most famously, in Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 4:54 pm
Miller, 425 U.S. 435 (1976). [read post]
