Search for: "State v. Dow" Results 321 - 340 of 1,045
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2016, 2:38 am by INFORRM
(ii) Abuse of process As established in the case of Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] EWCA Civ 75, the Court is required to stop defamation proceedings which serve no legitimate purpose, i.e. whether a ‘real and substantial tort’ had been committed. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
In the light of this, it considered that Parliament’s choice to use the wording of “serious harm” could only have represented an intentional departure from the previous decisions in Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 74 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC (QB) 1414. [read post]
22 May 2009, 4:10 am
The parties should also consider the guidance given by Arden LJ in Horvath v Secretary of State for Environment [2007] EWCA Civ 620 at [80]. [read post]
In 2021, Buntion appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States and asked the Justices to declare his 30 years on death row a cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
As Julian Knowles J stated, Part 11 is concerned with issues of personal jurisdiction, such as whether a claim form has been served properly. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The judge considered whether there had been a “real and substantial tort”, as required to serve defamation proceedings out of jurisdiction (Dow Jones & Co Inc. v Yousef Abdul Latif Jameel [2005] EWCA Civ 75). [read post]