Search for: "State v. J. L. B."
Results 321 - 340
of 2,334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2023, 7:16 am
Michael B. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 4:10 am
Inability to demonstrate the possession of a required license permits the summary termination of an incumbentMatter of Cravatta v New York State Dept. of Transp., 2009 NY Slip Op 51164(U), Decided on May 15, 2009, Supreme Court, Erie County, Judge Paula L. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am
Both petitioners (Ethicon and LifeScan) are owned by J&J. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 7:24 pm
., Alicia B. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
(c) The Contracting Parties shall endeavor to complete the process described in subparagraph (b) prior to the scheduled accession of a new Member State, or as soon as possible thereafter. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:21 am
L. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Emon & Aaqib Mahmood, Canada v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 12:40 pm
The Court is not unmindful that this analysis appears to be at odds with the Court of Appeals decision in People v Rodriguez (68 NY2d 674 [1986], revg for reasons stated in dissenting opn of Lazer, J., 113 AD2d 337, 343-348 [2d Dept 1985]). [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:52 am
") AC35312 - State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am
Victor L. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:07 pm
§273(b), but not in §284, is telling. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 9:10 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Calabresi & Saikrishna B. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 9:50 am
L. 431 (2007), I argued that fiduciary duties should not be owed to creditors of any entity type. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
(b) Definitions. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 6:23 am
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, State Unfair Competition, Breach of Fiduciary DutyCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Richard L. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:11 pm
B. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
Back in L'Oréal v Bellure NV [2006] EWHC 2355 (Ch), the High Court had held that there was no minimum threshold of similarity. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 10:18 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Andre L. [read post]
