Search for: "Thomas v. Brennan"
Results 321 - 340
of 352
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2013, 8:15 am
The 1941 case was somewhat ambiguous, but later cases routinely cited it for the proposition that employers, clearly including corporate employers, had free speech rights (e.g., Thomas v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm
Brennan, Jr. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 6:32 am
Court” Concordia Journal (17 January 2008), online: http://cjournal.concordia.ca/archives/20080117/ concordias_restitution_efforts_lead_to_landmark_ruling_in_us_court.php; United States Court of Appeals, Vineberg v Bissonnette 08-1136 November 19 2008; Max Stern Estate: 10th Painting Reclaimed” (5 March 2013) Concordia News Stories, online: http://www.concordia.ca/content/concordia/en/news/stories/2013/03/05/ max-stern-estate-10th-painting-reclaimed.html; Christie’s… [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:05 am
In FEC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:30 am
Justice Thomas's dissent, which Kavanaugh joined, lambasted District Judge Jesse F. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
In the 2004 decision, McConnell v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
Brennan’s aggressive liberalism, Scalia’s insistent originalism. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
Brennan’s aggressive liberalism, Scalia’s insistent originalism. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 8:34 am
In Tennessee v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Ryan (Associate Professor, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) and Thomas J. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
The Washington Supreme Court, in a case examining the similarly-worded telephone-harassment statute, has defined “intimidate” to include “compel[ling] to action or inaction (as by threats),” Seattle v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:53 am
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Chamberlain Professor of Legislation, Columbia Law School Jeremy Creelan, Partner, Jenner & Block, LLP, former Deputy Director of the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Do “we” ourselves often change our minds when reading legal opinions authored by, say, Samuel Alito or Clarence Thomas? [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am
Question: In what may well be an unprecedented event in Supreme Court history, in his McCutcheon v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Justice Thomas only this past week, for example, indicated that the Court should not be hesitant to overrule its own precedents should they be manifestly unjust.I realize that I basically agree with the McCloskeyan approach and, therefore, am inclined to agree with much of Lessig’s argument insofar as it is similar. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:46 pm
The key decision is Walz v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:52 pm
In Blum v. [read post]
