Search for: "United States v. Best" Results 321 - 340 of 12,042
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm by Steven Calabresi
United States, so it is hard to be wildly enthusiastic about any of them. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
Accordingly, states can—and should—revoke such authorization when doing so is in the best interest of the state as a whole. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
The United States is challenging their lawfulness before the U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 6:12 am by Ross Schulman
EFF had a welcome opportunity to direct attention toward the less-often discussed other potential uses of blockchains when we were invited to testify before the United States House Energy and Commerce Committee Subcommittee on Innovation, Data, and Commerce. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first oral contraceptive available in the United States without a prescription. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 1:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
From a supplement to a self-represented appellant's brief in Shaver v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 9:40 am by Eric Goldman
” Canada’s C-18 “link tax” has devastated independent journalism in Canada. * PetaPixel: “Photographer Who Won Warhol Copyright Case Paid Over $2.5M to Defend Rights” * United Federation of Churches LLC v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:36 pm by Ryan E. Long
For example, in a recent decision from United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the court found that wholly created AI works cannot be copyrighted. [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 11:28 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Special Issue: The Evidentiary System of the European Court of Human Rights in Critical Perspective Marie-Bénédicte Dembour, The Evidentiary System of the European Court of Human Rights in Critical Perspective Marie-Bénédicte Dembour, Beyond Reasonable Doubt at its Worst – But Also at its Potential Best: Dissecting Ireland v the United Kingdom’s No-Torture Finding Kristin Henrard, The European Court of Human… [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]