Search for: "United States v. State of Mich."
Results 321 - 340
of 943
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
Mark A. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:58 pm
The outcome in Stryker v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:51 am
National / International News <> House Hearing On "Waters of the United States" Proposal - The House Agriculture Committee, Subcommittee on Conservation and Forestry held a hearing on the EPA-Corps of Engineers propoal defining "Waters of the United States" or WOTUS. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 6:18 am
The Consent Decree is the subject of another case in this District, United States of America v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 6:49 am
[United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 7:42 am
Mich. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 7:14 am
Mich.): 1 Complaint An excerpt: This is a suit against the United States for breach of contract and statute by the Indian Health Service (“IHS”), an agency of the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) (collectively “Defendants”). [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:24 pm
Mich. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 8:00 am
Department of Corrections, 2015 Mich. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
United States (1985): In Diaz v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 8:22 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Mich. 2008) [13] See Viacom Int'l Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
” Sorrell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed Jones's conviction `because of admission of the evidence obtained by warrantless use of the GPS device. . . . [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are: Haygood v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 7:20 am
Mich. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am
The common law, as it developed in the United States from the early 19th century, was hospitable to apportionments that avoided “entire” or “joint and several” liability. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
” State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am
See also United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Local Appellate Rule 28.3(b) (Citation Form; Certification) (Aug. 1, 2011) (“For each legal proposition supported by citations in the argument, counsel must cite to any opposing authority if such authority is binding on this court, e.g., U.S. [read post]
