Search for: "W. E. Davis" Results 321 - 340 of 676
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
LEGAL DOCTRINE DESIGNED BY CITIBANK ATTORNEYS FOR COLLECTION OF DEFAULTED CONSUMER DEBT YIELDS DIVIDENDS AS OTHER TEXAS COURTS OF APPEALS FOLLOW PRECEDENT SET BY DALLAS COURT OF APPEALS IN 2008    What to do when you don't win all of your cases, such as a contract case when you can't find the contract, or some of the essential terms went missing? [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 10:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Davis, 275 F.3d 849 (9th Cir. 2001), abrogated on other grounds by Johnson v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
  “[W]e should do so only upon the most cogent of reasons being presented. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
Also, the Court has yet to set a Conference for the rescheduled Davis v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 8:30 am by Kali Borkoski
The critics’ view that the Court was obstructing Reconstruction, Ross concluded, seems reasonable to us now largely because “[w]e all know how this ends; black codes were resurrected with Jim Crow, and the Court began capitulating where it hadn’t before. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 9:13 am by Editors
Did your outside counsel make the list of attorneys with the best client service? [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Bridget Crawford
Davis Benngriffdavis Toledo Fergal  Davis  Fergal_Davis  Univ New South Wales Jeremy de Beer jdebeer Ottawa Dominic  de Cogan  domcogan  Cambridge Fiona De Londras fdelond Durham (UK) Sarah  Deer sarahdeer William Mitchell Marc DeGirolami MarcODeGirolami St. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 1:29 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 “[W]hile some of that gross revenue may well have been earned from customers that were not exposed to Congoo’s allegedly false statements, the [Davis] decision appears to place the burden on Defendants to prove that—not on Plaintiff to prove the opposite. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In Part One of this two-part series, I contended that the reading of the Obamacare statute offered by the plaintiffs in the important King v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am by Schachtman
Barrett) Ohio Northern University Claude W. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]