Search for: "Application of Stevens" Results 3381 - 3400 of 4,212
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2010, 8:25 am
This conclusion is further supported by the following: (1) the uncertaintycaused by the Government’s litigating position; (2) substantial timewould be required to clarify §441b’s application on the points raisedby the Government’s position in order to avoid any chilling effect caused by an improper interpretation; and (3) because speech itself is of primary importance to the integrity of the election process, anyspeech arguably within the reach of rules created for… [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:05 am by Maxwell Kennerly
" Stevens' conclusion puts the case in proper perspective: In a democratic society, the longstanding consensus on the need to limit corporate campaign spending should outweigh the wooden application of judge-made rules. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 9:45 am by Steve Hall
Justice John Paul Stevens and Anthony Kennedy dissented, with Stevens saying he cannot see why Wood's lawyer did not investigate or present "powerful mitigating evidence of Wood's mental deficits for the penalty phase" of the trial. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
My recent post, If A Wealth-Dominated Congress is So Great, Why Are Taxation and Other Policies Such a Mess? [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 10:29 am by Shaunna Mireau
Steven Iseman, Product Development Manager (Litigator, Civil Practice) shared this with me: As requested, I wanted to confirm for you some adaptations that we will be making to the Litigator templates and Rules Concordance to help you and your lawyers transition to the pending court rules: 1) The Rules Concordance will double-stream the Alberta Court Rules for a 6-12 month transitional period. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 6:20 am by stu@crimapp.com
Justice Breyer wrote the opinion, which seven other Justices joined in full; Justice Stevens concurred in part and concurred in the judgment. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
Section 6126.3 of the Business and Professions Code gives authority to a superior court, on its own motion or upon application of the State Bar, to assume jurisdiction of the business of a person who is not a lawyer. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
"Fair Market Value" is the term which is most often used by business appraisers and tax statutes says California Business Attorney Steven C. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 6:07 am by Paul Venard
”The court cited to arguments of those who claim such a broadcast would intimidate, and possibly lead to physical harm of, witnesses, stating that “While applicants have demonstrated the threat of harm they face if the trial is broadcast, respondents have not alleged any harm if the trial is not broadcast. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 9:42 pm by Steven Taber
--- Steven Taber, Aviation & Airport Development Law, December 22, 2009 The Department of Transportation’s new rule governing passengers’ treatment for delayed flights enhances passenger protections, but could make things worse in terms of consumer friendliness. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 3:03 pm by Rusty Shackleford
For many years, the trend in the U.S. has been towards abolishing the death penalty (as mentioned earlier, 15 states have done away with the death penalty) or severely limiting its application. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:43 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument at 11:30 a.m. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 6:42 am by Susan Brenner
Agent Jimmy Mance submitted his Affidavit in Support of the Application for Search Warrant. . . . [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:02 pm by John Elwood
The court held, first, that Noriega had failed to "assert any applicable law which would prevent his extradition to France. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
"**In passing, at least one blog has suggested Elena Kagan to be the nominee to replace Justice Stevens, after he announceshis retirement from the Supreme Court. [read post]