Search for: "Black v. United States"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 4,322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision in Biden v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 11:03 am
The Works of JohnAdams, Second President, of the United States. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:00 pm
He was a law clerk to United States District Judges Richard A. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 1:41 pm
Because getting shot by the cops — whether by tasers or guns — is just something I’ve come to expect in the United States of Amerika. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:55 am
Supreme Court, in Powell v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am
Instead of an increase in cost per treatment or per unit cost of a service such as a doctor’s visit, it is the amount of services and the types of services being used driving medical inflation. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 3:57 pm
Cal.) in Frankel v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:35 pm
United States, which held that federal criminal asset forfeiture statutes are “limited to property the defendant himself actually acquired as the result of the crime. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 5:29 am
No less an authority than the United States Supreme Court declared this a non-issue this year when they denied certiorari in Davis v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 2:33 pm
In 1967 the Supreme Court, in a case called Loving v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 8:57 am
Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 7:25 am
Sponsored Topics: United States - Government - Sonia Sotomayor - Politics - United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
” The third category of the statute thus prefers people who are 65 or older, giving them an entitlement to early voting by mail that younger persons do not enjoy unless they satisfy additional criteria.Plaintiffs challenged this law as violative of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment of the Constitution, which provides—also quite straightforwardly—that “[t]he right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied… [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:06 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 3:07 am
Later, in Mississippi, two black students were killed during a protest at Jackson State University. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 10:04 am
The main problem with Guantánamo, we suggested, was not that the United States was detaining people as “enemy combatants” but that it was not detaining the “right people. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 11:47 am
A wounded Abu-Jamal, his own gun lying nearby, was still at the scene when police arrived, and authorities consider the evidence against him overwhelming.Since Abu-Jamal's 1982 conviction, activists in the United States and Europe have rallied in support of his claims that he was the victim of a racist justice system. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 5:30 am
Today, we return to the United States to discuss the unusual case of Nickerson v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:30 am
It even closed with a discussion of Obergefell v. [read post]
