Search for: "State v. Davis " Results 3381 - 3400 of 6,079
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2013, 2:14 pm by Lee Davis
United States, dealt with the authority of police officers to detain those who leave a residence that officers have come to search.In an earlier case, Michigan v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
Tim Davie, acting director general, said that redactions were “driven by external legal advice. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 8:13 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF LNP, A Minor Child: KC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 12:30 pm by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch Brilliant Instruments v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:42 pm by Lee Davis
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently decided a case out of Tennessee involving a 13-year-old labeled a child abuser DCS but this label is vehemently contested by his parents.The case, Wright v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 3:30 am by Lee Davis
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently decided, Tonia Wright v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:35 am by Rob Merges
That trail was blazed by Learned Hand in his celebrated opinion in Parke-Davis v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:09 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: IN THE INTEREST OF RB, STATE OF WYOMING, by and through the office of the PARK COUNTY ATTORNEY v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 12:40 pm by Lee Davis
It is more of a question in cases where DNA evidence has nothing to do with the crime, such as in drug cases or property crimes.The case before the Supreme Court is Maryland v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Additionally, the contract does not violate the Statute of Frauds because the writing does not state a specific date of performance (i.e. closing date) or because of the failure to designate the nature of the interest being conveyed (See, e.g., Davis v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In my column today, I explore what might be learned from the decision by the House of Representatives last week and the seemingly imminent (as of this writing) decision of the Senate this week to pass a bill that seems on its face to directly violate the clear text of the Constitution. [read post]