Search for: "Fail v. State" Results 3401 - 3420 of 66,291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2022, 7:21 pm by Charlie Mounts
As a result, employers may now see more state whistleblower retaliation claims proceed to trial. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 6:17 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case highlights the distinctions between federal false arrest claims and state law malicious prosecution claims.The case is Shen v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 10:47 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
At the end of last week, the CFPB announced that it had entered into a consent order with State Farm Bank, FSB to settle allegations that the Bank violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Regulation V, and the Consumer Financial Protection Act in connection with furnishing information to consumer reporting agencies (CRAs ) and obtaining and using consumer reports. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:14 am
A factory worker's lawsuit alleges that her employer violated state labor laws by failing to allow her adequate restroom breaks, then firing her for improvising her own solution. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 4:00 pm
United States (06-11429) on what qualifies as a “felony drug offense” for federal sentencing purposes, in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:33 am
Notice of claim must be timely to trigger a duty to defend and indemnify the party being suedGutierrez v State of New York, 58 AD3d 805Typically lawsuits in which the issue is whether or not timely notice of a claim has been made involve individuals attempting to sue the State or a political subdivision of the State.The Gutierrez case concerns such a requirement except that in this instance the State is faulted for failing to give the “indemnifying… [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 3:22 pm by Howard Friedman
Givens, (11th Cir., Dec. 12, 2018), the 11th Circuit held that an inmate failed to state a First Amendment Claim growing out of the taking of his prayer oil.In Derx v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 6:11 am by Dan Bressler
” “High Court Rules That City Law Firm Breached Duties By Acting For Client Despite Conflict Of Interest And By Failing To Provide Adequate Costs Information Under CFA: Forster V Reynolds Porter Chamberlain [2023] EWHC 1150 (Ch)” — “In its recent decision in Forster v Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP, the High Court found that City law firm, RPC, had breached its duty of care to its client, Ms Forster, after failing to keep her… [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:26 am
 On February 9, 2009, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey decided the case of Martin v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:00 am by Orin Kerr
(3) Score one for consistency: Justice Alito’s test for when officers can remove a objector to trigger the usual common authority test of United States v. [read post]