Search for: "Doe Corporation" Results 3421 - 3440 of 51,598
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2023, 12:15 am
The General Corporation Law cannot address every "jot and tittle", but it is nevertheless surprising that it does not at least provide a ready answer to these and other fundamental questions. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Or does the nominee intend to serve as a faithful representative of an activist stockholder or a special interest group (favoring, for example, immediate voluntary carbon reduction or the elimination of plastic packaging)? [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:20 pm by Patricia Hughes
What is the relationship between or among rights: how does the Charter fit together? [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:19 pm by Madeline Suggs
Comparing New and Old Car Accident Statistics As the average age of vehicles on the road increases, so does the number of severe accidents. [read post]
9 May 2023, 11:22 am by Matthew Dochnal
YOUTUBE:WHAT DOES A REGISTERED AGENT DO? [read post]
9 May 2023, 10:30 am by Bob Ambrogi
Does the corporate legal market need yet another contract lifecycle management product? [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:47 am by Cory Doctorow
Each platform has its own technical ins-and-outs, and so any policy to protect users of a given platform must employ a finely detailed analysis to make sure it does what it’s supposed to do. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:25 am by Kelly Shivery
The topics on the agenda included: 1) Economic Crime and Cybercrime; 2) Healthcare Fraud; 3) The Corporate Credit Carrot: What does it mean to cooperate under DOJ’s updated regime; 4) DOJ’s New FCPA: Sanctions and Export Control Enforcement; 5) Ransomware: What You Need to Know; and 6) Tools of the Trade – The Government’s Increasing Use of RICO, Cooperators, and Wiretaps in White-Collar Cases. [read post]
9 May 2023, 8:42 am by Flupke van den Bogart
Yet, the current BRRD does not regulate in detail MREL calibration for transfer strategies. [read post]
9 May 2023, 6:30 am
Diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) is a highly debated topic in the corporate world these days. [read post]
9 May 2023, 6:30 am
Diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) is a highly debated topic in the corporate world these days. [read post]
9 May 2023, 5:05 am by Greg Lambert
But then I left I set up my own business, troubles consulting, which does strategy, innovation, blah, blah, blah. [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Nonetheless, she does identity two “stances” that are at the “core” of the “the economic style” (TLE 6). [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
Financial disclosure laws similarly allow corporations to leave some items “off book” for various purposes.Is something like that going on here? [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:34 am by Tiana Guzman
FDA approval does not guarantee that something was designed or manufactured correctly. [read post]
8 May 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  It does little to tell the story of the Supreme Court for the past twenty years, which is a repeated story of hostility to women. [read post]
8 May 2023, 6:11 am by Dan Bressler
” “‘It is in my view quite unfair for one of the largest, oldest, most successful and most sophisticated corporate entities in the world to induce a law firm’s reliance by agreeing to a waiver and a short time later say, ‘No, not so much, we really didn’t have enough information to inform our consent,’’ said Michael McCabe Jr., managing partner of McCabe & Ali in Washington, D.C. [read post]
8 May 2023, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
The Court stated that “the fact that the respondent previously laid off some of the appellant’s co-workers does not justify the result the motion judge reached as it does not constitute an implied term in the appellant’s contract to lay him off. [read post]
8 May 2023, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
The Court stated that “the fact that the respondent previously laid off some of the appellant’s co-workers does not justify the result the motion judge reached as it does not constitute an implied term in the appellant’s contract to lay him off. [read post]