Search for: "MATTER OF D S N"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 5,778
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2014, 5:45 pm
That’s a question of intent, and intent doesn’t matter. [read post]
5 May 2014, 2:28 pm
And in Gay Law Students Ass’n v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:23 am
Because it never mattered. [read post]
3 May 2014, 10:44 am
But that’s a matter for another day. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
Supp. 2d 1062, (D. [read post]
2 May 2014, 2:59 pm
In response to flaws in its 2005 Clean Air Interstate Rule, identified by the D. [read post]
2 May 2014, 4:41 am
Further, `[d]irect evidence of the mental state of the accused is rarely available except through his or her testimony. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 7:58 am
It’s a matter of self-created job security. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:44 am
By doing that, GoDaddy was hoping to have the appellate court either reverse the trial judge’s ruling (which would have ended its role in the suit) or remand the matter to the trial judge to re-determine whether the motion should have been granted. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 9:33 pm
But Apple, maybe due to arrogance that makes no sense in light of its eroding global market share, behaves in ways that just don't make it easy for antitrust enforcers (and not only for them) to keep supporting it over the years...If you'd like to be updated on the smartphone patent disputes and other intellectual property matters I cover, please subscribe to my RSS feed (in the right-hand column) and/or follow me on Twitter @FOSSpatents and Google+.Follow @FOSSpatents … [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
That’s some of the evidence that Cohan has said “didn’t matter. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 9:00 pm
Il s'agit donc bien d'une "entité physique".La nature de l’objet revendiqué ne constitue donc pas un obstacle à sa brevetabilité. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Amidst a basically content-free attack on people (including me) who have reviewed his book negatively, author William D. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:54 pm
§ 314(d) does not bar this court’s immediate review of the Director’s decision.St. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
In his C-SPAN interview, William D. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
R. 2014 QCCA 786 [6] L’appelant invoque deux arguments : 1) la preuve d’écoute électronique était irrecevable et devait être exclue et 2) le jugement de culpabilité est déraisonnable en ce que le juge de première instance n’a pas tenu compte d’éléments de preuve qui lui étaient favorables et en ce que la preuve circonstancielle pouvait aussi mener à un verdict… [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 2:26 pm
The over-the-air TV broadcasting industry’s lawyer, Washington attorney Paul D. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 5:20 am
After Plaintiffs brought suit and Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss, the Court sua sponte raised the issue of subject-matter jurisdiction, questioning whether Plaintiffs had sufficiently exhausted their administrative remedies with DOL. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 5:26 am
The show cause order directed Lavabit and Levison, individually, to appear and `show cause why Lavabit LLC ha[d] failed to comply with the orders entered June 28, 2013[ ] in this matter and why [the] Court should not hold Mr. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 12:34 pm
Here’s an excerpt from the California Supreme Court case, Conservatorship of Valerie N. [read post]
