Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 3441 - 3460 of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“[U]sers can easily create specific searches, including all Sherlock Holmes works posted in 2018 that are exactly 221 words long and Lord of The Rings/Game of Thrones crossovers that don't include either Frodo Baggins or Arya Stark. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
It was only a few years since Seager v Copydex: in two seminal Court of Appeal rulings, Lord Denning established both that the hitherto equitable doctrine that a breach of confidence might be restrained was in fact an “equitable tort” and that a court might award compensatory damages just as it would for the commission of any other tort. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 9:05 am by Jack Sharman
25 Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord! [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:05 am by Yvonne Dutton
For the first time in the ICC’s history, in September 2019 a Pre-Trial Chamber recognized charges of gender persecution in Prosecutor v. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
Legal IT posts 'Bloody foreigners' is a racist taunt, says Lords. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:07 am by AstuteLegalVideos.com
[v] “According to a 2007 interview Klein gave on Colombian TV, his infant firm made $2 million from that deal alone. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:51 am by Beck, et al.
(referring to the state’s adoption of Canterbury v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 1:35 pm by familoo
So, childrens' rights are significantly embedded in the family and difficult to separate from them (See The Christian Institute & Ors v The Lord Advocate (Scotland) [2016] UKSC 51 (28 July 2016) for an example of this in action, which Allan Norman wrote about on Pink Tape here). [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
Over 20 years ago, in 1993, the United States Supreme Court handed down its Daubert decision. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:32 am by Durga Rao
Jindal on the request of Lord Swaraj Paul and the Machino Group who is wholly and solely responsible for the formation of this company and that all the initial expenses for over a period of one year was borne by the Machino Group and that the Caparo Groups’ contribution came only a year after its incorporation when the company had already passed its take off stage. 6. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:00 pm by familoo
There are good things in this book, but much of it we have heard before – although I did not know until now that the infamous response letter in the matter of Arkell v Pressdram did not put off the claimant, and that litigation ensued anyway (albeit unsuccessful). [read post]