Search for: "*doe, Matter of" Results 3481 - 3500 of 140,374
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
So what does the Logan Act mean today, and is it even constitutional, given modern understandings of the First Amendment? [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 3:49 pm by Monica Scherer
” In other words, constructive contempt occurs outside of the courtroom and does not disrupt the normal operation of the court’s proceedings. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
Elenis (2023) ("Colorado seeks to force an individual to speak in ways that align with its views but defy her conscience about a matter of major significance. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:30 pm by Anderson Franco Law
It does not matter whether you injured yourself or someone else injured you. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:27 pm by Jillian C. York
York: What does free speech or free expression mean to you? [read post]
The post US Supreme Court declines to hear appeal from Black Lives Matter organizer being sued for negligence appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:42 am by Holman
 The Protocol does not include any efficacy or safety data, nor does it mention the claimed 1,650 mg/day dose or thrice-daily dosing. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 6:49 am by Samuel Bray
Poe: the case is about an injunction prohibiting enforcement of a state law against anyone, and the justices discuss the power to do this as a matter of equitable principles, leaving to one side the question of whether those principles are altered by the APA. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 6:44 am by Dan Bressler
‘The interest does not have to actually influence the action of the eight members, but only that the interest creates a conflict.'” “Minkowitz also denied Garcia’s requests to appoint a special master to supervise the planning board. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 6:42 am by familoo
He didn’t have to attend the hearing – as long as the court excused him (Which for reasons explained above the court usually does) – but he was entitled to do so if he wanted, which he did. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:26 am by Eugene Volokh
Importantly, this is based on the record before us as there is no dispute that all conversations concerned matters of public business, occurred while the deputies were on duty, and involved phones utilized for work purposes. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:01 am by INFORRM
What counts as a “matter of public interest” is broadly interpreted under the law. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
The government fumbled this quesion at the first argument but Kagan said that the government had changed its position and now: “We went back, we considered the matter carefully, and the government's view is that although [the statute] does cover full-length books, that there would be a quite good as-applied challenge to any attempt to apply [the law] in that context. [read post]