Search for: "State v. Greene"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 6,664
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2013, 10:34 am
In the case, Scott v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:30 pm
Horton v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:04 am
By Sara PulsState v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 9:14 am
(Will Baude) Justice Scalia’s opinion today in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing for the federal government in the case of United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:16 am
In 1972, in Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm
- Bernard Maister, Caspar van Woensel• Sport as a brand and its legal protection in South Africa - Owen Dean• Notes and updates• Comment on the Green Paper for post-school education and training - Shihaam Shaikh• Confusion and the bounds of trade mark monopolies: Foschini v Coetzee - Jeremy Speres• The panados and panadon’ts of trade mark registrations: recent developments regarding trademarks used in the pharmaceutical industry - Marius Roetz•… [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 12:08 pm
Case citation: Capp v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:10 am
The IPFinance weblog carries a short note on the launch of the WIPO GREEN database in which the author writes: "This blogger wonders how long it will be before the issues faced by the ICT sector with regard to standard-setting and FRAND licences are endemic in the green technology sector too. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 11:43 am
V (1780). [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 9:57 am
Green Building Council is raising the sustainability bar with its LEED v.4 green building standards, which made their debut at the Greenbuild 2013 conference in Philadelphia this week. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
The Center for Civic Mediation and LA County Bar are presenting a program tonight on the law of arbitration: "Will California Arbitration Law Survive the United States Supreme Court?" [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:24 am
The Federal Court relied on Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
Indeed, Eugene V. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm
Smith-Green Mortuary Sciences College Student Disciplined for Threatening Facebook Posts–Tatro v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
As Judge Greene explains in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 12:26 am
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
