Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 3501 - 3520
of 13,580
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2012, 10:03 am
United States of America v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 10:03 am
United States of America v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:45 am
In R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD; the Court ruled by a 4-1 majority that the executive’s decision to bar Mrs Rajavi’s admission into the UK on grounds that it would not be conducive to the public good was rational and Secretary of State had not underrated the appellants’ ECHR, art 10 rights or overstated the risk. [read post]
Officer’s California whistleblower claim not collaterally estopped by State Personnel Board decision
16 Sep 2015, 8:20 am
In State Board of Chiropractic Examiners v Superior Court, a case with a similar procedural history, the state high court held that “the Legislature did not intend the State Personnel Board’s findings [in a whistleblower retaliation case] to have a preclusive effect against the complaining employee. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:27 pm
Stack v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Leslie C. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 9:09 am
” In the case of Edney v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
R. [read post]
9 May 2018, 2:15 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 11:01 pm
In a judgment of 9 September 2015 (Christophe Bohez v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:37 pm
Canby, Sidney R. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 1:50 pm
Henry C. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
R. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 12:07 pm
District Judge Robert C. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:13 pm
”Youngblood v. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 10:57 pm
R. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
Michael C. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:14 pm
The Law Offices of John C. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 9:28 am
In particular here, the Judge entered a R.52(c) judgment against the PTO – finding that it had failed to present a prima facie case of prosecution laches. [read post]
