Search for: "House v. Close" Results 3521 - 3540 of 7,516
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
  While the trial court agreed that it was exempt, the appellate court reversed on the basis that the change undermined the city’s ability to meet its state share of housing needs when it relied upon the “anticipated densities” when developing its housing element. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 9:15 am by Farah Mukaddam (UK)
Background Specsavers sued Asda in the English High Court for trade mark infringement after Asda launched an advertising campaign for its in-house opticians. [read post]
31 May 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/7SdSpVHx6C #googlealerts #feedly -> White House Finally Stands Up to Google siding with Oracle in dispute over copyright in APIs https://t.co/Ekszn9egGW #googlealerts #feedly -> Google Faces New Hurdle in Oracle Copyright Fight https://t.co/766v1DS3Sy #googlealerts #feedly -> Sirius XM to face class action in Turtles copyright lawsuit https://t.co/NMck6F0GvX #googlealerts #feedly -> Jamaica Parliament begins debate on law to extend copyright period… [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:04 pm by Steve Sady
” The major new case was the ground-breaking decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 11:43 pm by Wouter Pors
Although of course the judgment is strictly a legal reasoning, it also comes as close to a political statement as the CJEU will probably ever get. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 2:37 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Maatman, Jr. and Laura Maechtlen In a ruling on December 19, 2014, in EEOC v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 6:10 am
Testimony further established that during this period, the defendant was at the house frequently. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:52 am by Robert Percival
I just returned from this morning’s oral argument in Department of HHS v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 10:39 am by Derek Bambauer
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the U.S. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 1:22 am by divi
Employers are prohibited from requesting employees sign a release of a claim or right under the state Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) in order to receive a raise or bonus or as a condition of employment or continued employment. [read post]