Search for: "In re Miller"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 3,905
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2018, 5:16 am
Miller and Smith v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:36 pm
Now imagine you're the government, and you want to collect the suspect's evidence. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:44 pm
Now imagine you’re the government, and you want to collect the suspect’s evidence. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 10:42 am
When the court is challenged on its supremacy over constitutional interpretation, it confronts the primary commitments of the majority coalition and (re)establishes its institutional legitimacy. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 6:10 am
They’re not here to hurt me. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
Miller, 405 F.3d 700, 25 A.L.R.6th 695 (8th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 126 S. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:33 pm
If you’re not able to pay off what you owe in full, you should make an attempt to submit smaller payments. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 5:52 pm
Peter Cherbi's "A Diary of Injustice in Scotland" reports on the poor state of Scotland's legal profession .. you really would think there is something to worry about ! [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
App. 1985); Miller v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Miller, No. 08-1069, 08-1089 Conviction of one defendant for being a felon in possession of a firearm, and conviction and sentence of a second defendant for aiding and abetting that possession, are affirmed where: 1) there was sufficient evidence to support the convictions; and 2) the second defendant was not eligible for a sentence reduction as a mere collector of guns. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:22 am
In reaching this conclusion, the court initially cited to the opinion of the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, in In re Michael, 694 N.E.2d 538 (Ohio App. 2 Dist. 1997). [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 8:32 am
Commercial Speech: Past, Present & Future: A Tribute to Steven Shiffrin, sponsored by the Loyola Law School Los Angeles and the Loyola Law Review Opening roundtable discussion, Ronald Collins, First Amendment Center, moderator. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:16 am
This is the dangerous – and entirely predictable – result of the decision to re-platform Trump. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Miller, No. 06-5187 Conviction and sentence for receiving child pornography, possessing the same images of child pornography, and marijuana possession is vacated and remanded for re-sentencing where: 1) although defendant's conviction for receiving child pornography was supported by substantial evidence, double jeopardy barred convictions for both receiving and possessing the same images of child pornography; and 2) defendant's testimony regarding his collection of adult… [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
We’re not entirely sure, but to some extent not discussing damages means not discussing losing. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
In Descamps, Justice Kagan wrote for the Supreme Court on an issue that permeates our work as federal defenders: what impact do prior convictions have on our clients’ freedom? [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
It talks about legal standards, and its logic is interesting (note: if you're bright, you'll be able to tell what parts of the opinion could just as easily gone the other way if the Court had so chosen). [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4] At the… [read post]
