Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 3541 - 3560 of 42,199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2014, 1:25 am by Andrew Trask
  And no matter how unpleasant it may be in the short term, reducing the number of bad cases brought benefits everyone. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:29 am by Patrick Maines
Still, it’s a more interesting issue than, on its face, it would appear to be – and there’s evidence that defenders of the rule, along with reporters, are not paying attention to some of the finer points being made in opposition to it. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:51 pm
Houston Chronicle columnist Rick Casey wrote Monday about the confusing law that allows the commission to investigate the case's arson findings but prohibits examination of evidence presented to the jury because it was introduced before September 1, 2005.Despite the AG's ruling, Sen. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 8:44 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Supreme Court Case Daubert and its progeny provide guidelines for courts in many jurisdictions. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 7:27 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
According to the court’s logic, therefore, since they are addressed in Rule 403, however, there is no evidence that the defendants were controlling the work parameters of the plaintiffs. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:52 am by South Florida Lawyers
Well Magistrate Judge Simonton wants to put a stop to such verbal detritus, and her general discovery order outlines a vision for a better, more substantive discovery world, where people answer interrogatories in good faith and no one interposes "vague" or "overbroad" objections unless there's a really good reason.Take a gander and you may have a tear in your eye by the time you're finished:The parties shall not make nonspecific, boilerplate objections....Objections… [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:01 pm by Sheldon Lustigman
The ALJ also ruled that the clinical evidence presented by POM was sufficient to show that consuming the product promoted erectile health, which is different from being a treatment for the medical condition of treating erectile dysfunction. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 7:08 am by Robert Guest
Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted and is inadmissible unless a statute or rule of exception applies. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:40 pm by Patricia Salkin
Woodstock appealed the decision to the trial court, which found that the Rush BZA decision “… was not supported by substantial, reliable, and probative evidence. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 11:11 am by Peter Tillers
That is a matter of context pointing to the view that there is a proof of assumption rule with which those tendering expert opinion evidence must comply by reason of ss 55, 56 and 79 read against the background of the common law. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 10:54 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
"Sufficiency of corroboration is determined by using a 'rule of reason' analysis, under which all pertinent evidence is examined when determining the credibility of an inventor's testimony. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 4:19 pm by Andrew Delaney
   The Baird matter involves the somewhat unusual and arcane matter of the “felony-murder rule. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Following an investigation, EEO had issued determinations finding that there was sufficient credible evidence that the employees named in the complaint had engaged in unlawful retaliatory conduct and referring the matter to the Department's Bureau of Investigations and Trials. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Following an investigation, EEO had issued determinations finding that there was sufficient credible evidence that the employees named in the complaint had engaged in unlawful retaliatory conduct and referring the matter to the Department's Bureau of Investigations and Trials. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 5:00 am by Guest Blogger
This is seldom done for a number of reasons, but evidence from unitary countries shows that it is possible. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 4:07 pm
The evidence offered attributed the undue influence and fraud solely to proponent. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:49 am by Dave Abels
The Supreme Court of Illinois had already ruled that nearly identical claims against one of the defendants in this case must fail as a matter of law, and the circuit court found it necessary to rule against the plaintiff on the same grounds. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 10:10 pm
 And if they can’t prove the traffic violation, then the judge will have to grant a Motion to Suppress and throw the case out.Not so fast.There’s no rule requiring the State to present videotape evidence in a DWI, or in any other type of criminal case for that matter. [read post]