Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 6,130
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2013, 12:03 am
The court a quo justified its approach in para 26 by stating:"In my view, in order for a Court to make an appropriate and correct finding, it must undertake such an exercise keeping in mind, of course, the relevant importance of the first and general impression.If a Court does not undertake that exercise and relies solely on a first and general impression, it runs the risk of failing to distinguish between unlawful passing off and lawful competition." [read post]
19 May 2013, 1:00 pm
This a late note on OR -v- Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and Isle of Anglesey CC [2013] UKUT 065 (AAC) because, bluntly, I had read it quickly at the time and overlooked its broader significance.The issue was whether OR could receive housing benefit for his stays in a night shelter hostel. [read post]
19 May 2013, 1:00 pm
This a late note on OR -v- Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and Isle of Anglesey CC [2013] UKUT 065 (AAC) because, bluntly, I had read it quickly at the time and overlooked its broader significance.The issue was whether OR could receive housing benefit for his stays in a night shelter hostel. [read post]
16 May 2013, 7:16 am
In this week’s case (Van Tent v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:33 am
§ 112, ¶ 2 (2002). [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:41 am
Cir. 1991), quoting Newkirk v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:43 am
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court recently decided State of Maine v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:00 am
They do not form part of the Act and have not been endorsed by Parliament” (para 1). [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:00 am
B Commentary, ¶ 6(b)(7). [6] Guerra v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:08 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 3:17 pm
See, e.g., McTear v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 8:00 am
” State v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 7:54 am
(Complaint, ¶ 9(a).) [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:56 pm
¶ 5. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 11:49 pm
United States, 265F.3d 1371, 1377–79 (Fed. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 7:30 am
El Tribunal Superior sigue el razonamiento de la corte de Apelaciones de Estados Unidos del tercer circuito en State Farm v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
The decision by Justice O’Donnell in R. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 5:55 pm
In Schultz v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:05 pm
Constitution (Gratz v Bollinger, 84 EPD ¶41,416 ). [read post]