Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 3561 - 3580 of 6,130
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2013, 12:03 am by Caroline Ncube
 The court a quo justified its approach in para 26 by stating:"In my view, in order for a Court to make an appropriate and correct finding, it must undertake such an exercise keeping in mind, of course, the relevant importance of the first and general impression.If a Court does not undertake that exercise and relies solely on a first and general impression, it runs the risk of failing to distinguish between unlawful passing off and lawful competition." [read post]
19 May 2013, 1:00 pm by Giles Peaker
This a late note on OR -v- Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and Isle of Anglesey CC [2013] UKUT 065 (AAC) because, bluntly, I had read it quickly at the time and overlooked its broader significance.The issue was whether OR could receive housing benefit for his stays in a night shelter hostel. [read post]
19 May 2013, 1:00 pm by Giles Peaker
This a late note on OR -v- Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and Isle of Anglesey CC [2013] UKUT 065 (AAC) because, bluntly, I had read it quickly at the time and overlooked its broader significance.The issue was whether OR could receive housing benefit for his stays in a night shelter hostel. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:43 am by Luke Rioux
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court recently decided State of Maine v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:00 am by INFORRM
They do not form part of the Act and have not been endorsed by Parliament” (para 1). [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 7:30 am by Brian Price
  El Tribunal Superior sigue el razonamiento de la corte de Apelaciones de Estados Unidos del tercer circuito en State Farm v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Alice Woolley
The decision by Justice O’Donnell in R. v. [read post]