Search for: "STATE v. DAVIS" Results 3561 - 3580 of 6,177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 8:48 am by WSLL
Summary of Decision December 21, 2012 Justice Davis delivered the opinion for the Court. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:21 pm
Rule — Sabey Rule LLP, KelownaUsing Unjust Enrichment as a Remedy in Estate Litigationcurrent state of the lawwhen is this remedy most effective to pleadelements of unjust enrichmentjoint family ventures after Kerr v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 11:06 am by Mark S. Humphreys
That question was answered in 1936, by the Beaumont Court of Appeals in the case, Love et al. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 10:02 am
Donnell Dingle Subscription Required BRONX COUNTYCriminal Practice Court Permits State's Counsel To Be Present, Videotape Psychiatric Exam of Respondent Matter of State of New York v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm by Richard Hunt
The applicable statute of limitations, borrowed from state law, was four years. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:07 am by Andrew Hamm
Davis, when it is plausible that the failure to investigate that aspect of petitioner’s background on state postconviction review could, given substantial authority recognizing counsel’s duty to do so, excuse the procedural default of an ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 12:39 pm by Guest Blogger
State Bar Director Christy Amuny of Beaumont and Granbury attorney Cindy V. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:43 pm by cdw
Other cases of note includes yet another grant of relief in Arizona on aggravating factor (F)(6) (heinousness, cruelty, and depravity) in State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 12:08 pm by Jeanne Huang
Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v Schlunk decided by the Supreme Court of the US and Segers and Rufa BV v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 12:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Perhaps unsurprisingly, a federal court sent his hostile work environment claim under Title VII to trial (Davis v. [read post]