Search for: "STATE v. HARRIES" Results 3561 - 3580 of 5,754
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2012, 10:26 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
The purpose of a separate statement of undisputed facts is to Provide the court with a document that plainly and concisely specifies all material facts that are claimed to be undisputed (CCP §437c(b)(1)); Provide the court with clear reference to evidence supporting each material fact (Cal Rules of Ct 3.1350); and Afford due process to opposing parties (State ex rel Harris v PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (2005) 125 CA4th 1219, 1262 n28, 23 CR3d 529,… [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 10:53 am
  Take for example the spinal plate at issue in Harris v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 6:25 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"Here's an analysis from last year I hadn't seen by Alycia Welch at the UT-Austin LBJ School titled, "Harris County Sheriff's Office Management Failures: Inadequate Medical Care at the Harris County Jail. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
At Greenwire (subscription required), Ellen Gilmer reports that in Kisor v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:24 am by Maureen Johnston
Harris) is the only evidence that is sufficient to overcome conflicting version of events. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Harris 13-1313Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause allows California to impose a complete ban on the sale of wholesome, USDA-approved poultry products from other States and countries - in this case, foie gras - based solely on the agricultural methods used by out-of-state farmers who raise their animals entirely beyond California's borders. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 7:24 am by Lyle Denniston
All of this comes about because the court has recently begun to ponder what to do with the case titled Harris v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Sean Burke
In 2014, the Court held in  Harris v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm by Schachtman
  The Harris Court cited, with approval, a 2002 traumatic cancer case, State ex rel. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:40 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Coke's inauguration restored Democratic control in Texas.Imagine if, upon receipt of the Supreme Court order in Bush v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:51 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently declined to rehear en banc Fazaga v. [read post]