Search for: "Ada County Courts" Results 341 - 360 of 943
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2017, 11:17 am by Melissa L. Greipp
Many ADA’s invited me and other interns to observe different court proceedings and trials. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 1:20 pm by admin
Baltimore County, a Maryland District Court allowed a corrections officer to continue with his claim for disability discrimination under the ADA against his employer. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 12:42 pm by admin
District Court of Pennsylvania rejected a pro se former corrections officer’s ADA disability and retaliation claims, granting summary judgment to Schuylkill County because the officer failed to show that he was a qualified individual within the meaning of the ADA, […] The post U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 8:30 am by Law Offices of Nancy J. Bickford, APC
At a later proceeding, her attorney expressed deep concern for the Court refusing the ADA request and attempted to leave the courtroom. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 3:47 pm by Legal Profession Prof
The Idaho Supreme Court has issued this recent decision in a legal malpractice case. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 7:20 am by Joy Waltemath
” A county commissioner testified that the county usually employs two groundskeepers at West Park. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
And the answer may surprise you: Here, the district court did not err by finding that the essential functions of the groundskeeper position included all of those activities listed in the County’s written job description. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
And the answer may surprise you: Here, the district court did not err by finding that the essential functions of the groundskeeper position included all of those activities listed in the County’s written job description. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 1:54 pm by Joy Waltemath
Broward County, Florida that wellness programs that are part of a bona fide group plan fell under the “safe harbor” provision of the ADA as a term of the health plan, an interpretation that the court noted “would appear to have allowed employers to impose unlimited penalties or incentives on employees to induce them to participate in wellness programs, including those programs that required the disclosure of ADA-protected information. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:03 am by Stephen Wermiel
In dismissing the Visa petitions, the Supreme Court referred to a ruling in 2015, City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]