Search for: "Central State Agency, Inc., Matter of" Results 341 - 360 of 667
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym of the Federal District Court for the District of Central California. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:07 am by Joy Waltemath
UPS, Inc., a 2009 Third Circuit decision, to mean that the EEOC’s ADA claims here could not be litigated on a classwide or pattern-or-practice basis as a matter of law. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
 To the contrary, prescribing physicians are central where prescription medical products are concerned. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:47 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
In January 2008, federal agents from several law enforcement agencies raided several locations, including four museums in California. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
The question involves whether the agency’s determination constitutes “final agency action” under Bennett v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 12:38 pm by Schachtman
The Reference Manual’s chapter on toxicology also weighs in on Paracelsus: “There are three central tenets of toxicology. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
After argument, the trial judge granted the County's [Court Rules] 12(b)(6) motion, determining as a matter of law that records of private cell phone use can never be public records under the PRA. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  The simplest approach in concept probably would be to remove or override domestic legal prohibitions on disclosure, where desired, in response to certain types of favored foreign production directives.[37]  As a matter of U.S. law, this would not be difficult technically (although it might be very challenging politically). [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 10:50 am by Daniel Schwartz
  In its Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. case, the Board concluded that Browning-Ferrris was a joint employer of workers supplied to it by a staffing agency that it contracted with. [read post]