Search for: "Century v. Fitness" Results 341 - 360 of 1,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2008, 6:00 am by Doug Kmiec
  He does make reference to 19 th century case law approving of the perspective. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/bGMN6YpnxR -> Google Can Derive Undisclosed Economic Benefits From CAPTCHAs–Rojas-Lozano v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
In other words, Alito is who he always was, and the "Concerned Alumni of Princeton," with their focus on white-male success, was a perfect fit for him.2) When the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Cricket Lighters, 841 A.2d 1000 (Pa. 2003), three justices of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court opined that a quarter century had proven wanting the “strict liability” of the Azzarello sort, and that Pennsylvania law should move to the negligence-based standard of §2. 841 A.2d at 1015-16. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:00 am by Ed Driscoll
There might be young people unaware of the dire historical facts and the unspeakable human toll of that war, but for almost everyone else, the sheer scale of the losses and nightmarish reality of the trenches, repeated in refrain for almost a century, has dulled us to the staggering truth of it all. [read post]
22 May 2016, 6:06 pm by Justin A
Supreme Court case from the past century is BFP v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by David Kopel
Part V addresses Miller and Tucker's claim that the American Founders were unfamiliar with dramatic technological changes in firearms — a claim that is refuted by Dupuy's data. [read post]
27 May 2018, 2:35 pm by Ilya Somin
But black criminals have proven they aren't fit to integrate with white society. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 11:55 am by Ilya Somin
The decision was still backed by more recent precedent, most notably the Court's 1954 decision in Berman v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 12:02 am
The controlling opinion on the point in Ford v. [read post]