Search for: "DEFENDANT DOE 1-10"
Results 341 - 360
of 12,393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2010, 5:16 pm
The Court is not convinced that Defendants pay Plaintiffs “a fixed salary that does not vary with the number of hours worked during each workweek (excluding overtime premiums). [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 8:57 pm
Id., at 10. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:11 pm
(…)The defendant objects to Topics 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, and 17 in large part because the plaintiff seeks fact-specific information that is normally elicited by means other than a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition since such information does not relate to the defendant's corporate position. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 6:50 am
When 10-15 agents entered the house, they told defendant she was not going anywhere. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:14 pm
Op. at 10. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:31 pm
The reality of the situation is that any one person’s chances of being audited are relatively low – approximately 1 out of every 167 returns in 2017 was audited by the IRS. (1) While the chances might be slim, the possibility of getting audited, and having tax fraud charges filed against you, as a result, does exist. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:31 pm
The reality of the situation is that any one person’s chances of being audited are relatively low – approximately 1 out of every 167 returns in 2017 was audited by the IRS. (1) While the chances might be slim, the possibility of getting audited, and having tax fraud charges filed against you, as a result, does exist. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Education Law §3811 provides that the trustees or board of education have the right to designate and appoint legal counsel for an eligible employee as long as it does so within 10 days of receiving notice of the relevant action or proceeding; otherwise the employee may select his or her own legal counsel; and 4. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
Ed. 2d 519, 10 S. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:33 pm
Includes posting material involving the sexual exploitation of a minor on a website for public viewing but does not include the mere solicitation of such material by a defendant. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:21 am
Rosenwinkel, No. 113569 – Does the Farm Nuisance Act, 740 ILCS 70/1, bar a nuisance suit where defendants started a cattle operation on property across from an unoccupied farmhouse, and several years later, plaintiffs demolished the farmhouse and constructed a new family home? [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 2:27 pm
Id. at *1. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 9:20 am
This prompts a few questions:1. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 9:53 pm
In my continued effort to cross reference the current Supreme Court rules with the new Rules of Court that come into force on July 1, 2010 I will note that the Current Rule 57(10) will become Rule 14-1(10) and it reads identical to the current rule so the precedents developed under Rule 57(10) regarding costs should continue to assist litigants under our new rules. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:17 pm
Doe v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 5:23 am
The fact that they sleep over only four nights does not matter. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 10:00 pm
" That role, as the Federal Defenders point out, includes two components: (1) reliance on empirical evidence of pre-guidelines sentencing practice, and (2) review and revision in light of judicial decisions, sentencing data, and comments from participants and experts in the field. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:44 pm
Defendant was a minor participant in the present offense. 10. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 1:24 pm
Singh was initially paid a 10% commission, but in 2009, ABC agreed to pay Singh 12% on his sales and an additional 1% on the sales by other ABC salespersons. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
Does 1-245, Case No. 3:10-cv-00096, *3 (Bailey, J.) [read post]
