Search for: "Ed Phillips"
Results 341 - 360
of 656
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Dallas Court of Appeals addresses complex issues in appeal from summary judgment in suit by tort clients who sued their lawyers for barratry CARL "STACEY" NEESE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF L.N., C.N., L.N., AND C.N., JAMES NEESE, DAVID NEESE, JENNIFER HUGHES, MITZI RENFROE, AND IRL HOOPER, Appellants, v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
UPDATE ON NEESE VS. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 12:17 pm
She was terminated at the end of June on the grounds that she had “deceiv[ed] Defendant about her pregnancy and fail[ed] to disclose her need for maternity leave at the time of the job interview. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:57 am
The supervisor allegedly drew “offensive sketches and creat[ed] other pictures of Plaintiff in a sexually suggestive manner,” id., and then distributed them around the office and posted them online. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:16 am
Those rights preexist(ed) the Spanish and Mexican governments, both of which recognized aboriginal title in their law generally as well as in (conditions stated expressly in) land grants issued to their citizens, including at least one at issue in this case. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:57 am
However, thirty-plus years of scholarship, including many articles and such books as Howard Gilman’s “The Constitution Besieged,” David Mayer’s “Liberty of Contract,” Michael Phillips’s “The Lochner Court: Myth and Reality,” and my own “Rehabilitating Lochner“ soundly rebut each of Roberts’s assertions. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
Most epidemiologic studies are not admissible. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:13 am
Phillips v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 1:00 am
TaxProf Blog op-ed: D.C. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:36 am
Cir. 2013) (citing Phillips v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
”) (citing and quoting among other sources, Federal Judicial Center, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, 599 & n.141 (3d. ed. 2011)). [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am
News), Richard Wolf of USA Today, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, Bob Barnes and Amber Phillips of The Washington Post, and Tony Mauro of the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required). [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am
In an op-ed for The Hill, Juan Williams weighs in on King v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm
In Daubert, the Supreme Court set out several criteria or factors for evaluating the “reliability” of expert witness opinion testimony. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm
The People counter that the non-hearsay allegations of the complaint establish that the defendant "grab[bed] a three-year-old child by the arm, and drag[ed] him into a bathroom" and that "the child was then removed to a local hospital to be checked for injuries. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm
The People counter that the non-hearsay allegations of the complaint establish that the defendant "grab[bed] a three-year-old child by the arm, and drag[ed] him into a bathroom" and that "the child was then removed to a local hospital to be checked for injuries. [read post]
24 May 2015, 9:00 pm
The People counter that the non-hearsay allegations of the complaint establish that the defendant “grab[bed] a three-year-old child by the arm, and drag[ed] him into a bathroom” and that “the child was then removed to a local hospital to be checked for injuries. [read post]
8 May 2015, 4:58 am
At the Keen News Service, Lisa Keen focuses on a question by Chief Justice John Roberts on sex discrimination, while at Public Discourse James Phillips corrects “six mistakes” from the argument. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 8:52 am
Mark Phillips, president of the Arizona-based Lipsmark, told WRAL that “no one wants a nanny state telling its citizens what they can and cannot drink. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 3:56 pm
(Phillips Chemical Co. v. [read post]
