Search for: "Hall v. Texas" Results 341 - 360 of 684
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 12:04 pm
Moreover, while the government doesn’t violate the Establishment Clause by setting up a forum that is open to speakers, whether religious or otherwise (again, see Rosenberger), it does violate the Establishment Clause by specially favoring religious speakers (see Texas Monthly, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:36 am by Jeff Welty
Earlier this week, I blogged about Hall v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 6:46 am by Joy Waltemath
Wal-Mart countered that when the plaintiff was “ejected” from Dukes, she was no longer a member of any class and, under the Fifth Circuit’s decisions in Salazar-Calderon v Presidio Valley Farmers Ass’n and Hall v Variable Annuity Life Ins. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 7:06 am by Ron Miller
In D’Andrea v Epstein, Becker, Green, Wickliff & Hall, PC, a Texas Court of Appeals found that preparation of the memo implicated the law firm’s fiduciary duty to the client and also determined that fact issues remained as to whether a reasonably prudent attorney would have foreseen that the memo would likely harm the client and whether it was foreseeable that the discharged employee would have used the memo against the client. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:35 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 176641 (ND IN, Dec. 17, 2013), an Indiana federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that the jail's policy that one-on-one clergy visits to be conducted via video monitor effectively denied him visits with his minister.In Hall v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 11:28 am by Dan Ernst
  While we're at it, we'll note the publication of The Second Amendment on Trial: Critical Essays on District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am by John Elwood
  Howell asserts that the Hog and Hominy State’s approach to identifying mental retardation violates Atkins, suggesting in his reply that the case be held for Hall v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:45 am by Matt Bouchard
  Well, if the $4.8 billion (yes, that’s billion, with a “b”) expansion of I-35E in Texas is any indication, the sky’s the limit. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm by John Elwood
Environmental Protection Agency, 12-1268; Texas v. [read post]