Search for: "In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2025, 6:38 am
” “‘The concern here is you’re throwing public tax dollars to your (church’s) board member,’ Helmke said. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
IV, § 4.But what do concerns about consequences have to do with the LAW? [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 11:43 am
Her comment, and the unanimous decision invalidating gene patents, clearly expressed the court's concern that the Patent Office is overstepping its authority by approving patents that thwart, rather than foster, scientific inquiry and progress. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 5:30 pm
Thank you, Judge Freedman!] [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am
In In re Silica, the prospect of creating a mass tort out of whole cloth seems to have had just such a distorting influence.[12] As noted by Judge Jack, in making the reliability inquiry, the trial judge has the responsibility “to make certain that an expert … employs in the courtroom the same level of intellectual rigor that characterizes the practice of an expert in the relevant field. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 7:30 am
Even if every Federal Circuit § 1404(a) mandamus decision were treated as binding precedent, the fact-intensive and case-specific nature of the § 1404(a) inquiry arguably permits a judge (whether a district judge or a Federal Circuit judge deciding a mandamus petition) to justify almost any outcome in a given case. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Normally when we talk about consumer protection we’re concerned w/ a particular category of consumers regarded as vulnerable: lack the same level of info as businesses in the marketplace. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:09 am
The respondent had argued that the Supreme Court decision in In Re McCaughey’s Application for Judicial Review [2011] UKSC 20, [2012] 1 AC 725 needed to be considered in the light of the Grand Chamber’s observations in Janowiec v Russia (55508/07) (2014) 58 EHRR 30. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 11:18 pm
In In re Digitek Prod. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 2:02 pm
Judge Johnson first distinguished himself in In re Accutane, No. 271(MCL), 2015 WL 753674, 2015 BL 59277 (N.J.Super. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:12 pm
A court’s overriding concern must be to safeguard public confidence in the judiciary. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:00 am
See In re Actos (Pioglitazone) Prods. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 5:08 am
The inquiry ends there. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 5:08 am
The inquiry ends there. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 6:31 am
That’s the nature of guilty pleas, that they end the inquiry. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 4:38 am
” In re Am. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:50 am
The problem in Santiago, of course, is the timing: the judge’s inquiry didn’t come until after imposition of sentence. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:56 pm
should judges imply one?) [read post]
Latest Twist in the Flynn Case Highlights the Danger of Judicial Deference to Trump’s Administration
24 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
”Deference has been especially prevalent in cases concerning decisions not to prosecute—cases in which courts have resisted issuing writs of mandamus requiring prosecution. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 1:35 pm
The appropriate inquiry is if a confidential relationship existed, did the parties deal on terms and conditions of equality? [read post]
