Search for: "In re: Smith et al"
Results 341 - 360
of 430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2009, 1:58 am
Walgreens et al (CAFC 2009-1237) precedential Judge DYK penned this opinion, with which Judge Bryson concurred. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Post-AIA (Point Estimate) We thank LaTia Brand of Harrity Analytics and the Stanford NPE Database, described in Shawn Miller et al., Who’s Suing Us? [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 4:26 pm
Smith, D. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 10:52 pm
Barris et al: fielding occasional calls about one’s job is a “professional courtesy” that does not interfere with FMLA rights (FMLA claims dismissed) Persson v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:26 pm
But judges too often dismiss cases as moot when they're not—whether out of an excessive sense of deference to public officials, fear of deciding controversial cases, or simple good faith mistake. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
U.S. defendants can request access to the evidence, but there is, as Judge Stephen Smith has detailed, increasing deference in federal courts to so-called "law enforcement privilege"—the withholding of information about evidence-gathering techniques during a trial—can extend to software and prevent its examination for errors. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
U.S. defendants can request access to the evidence, but there is, as Judge Stephen Smith has detailed, increasing deference in federal courts to so-called "law enforcement privilege"—the withholding of information about evidence-gathering techniques during a trial—can extend to software and prevent its examination for errors. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
James III, et al. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Pfizer (femoral stem) Deposition1998-08-31 In re AMS Minnesota Penile Prosthesis Litigation Deposition1998-08-31 In re Guidant Implantable Defibrillators PLL Deposition1998-09-09 Suerth v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm
The Transparency Project has published a summary of Re B, R & G (a Child) [2022] EWHC 320 (Fam), in which the local authority was applying for reporting restrictions for the trial of G and E’s parents, who were charged with the murder of E. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am
Landow Aviation LP, et al. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
The Supreme Court articulated the meaning of materiality in cases in the 1970s and 1980s.[6] It is this standard of materiality that is reflected in Commission rules.[7] It is this same materiality standard that appears in numerous disclosure rules governing registration statements and public company annual reports.[8] It is this same materiality standard that is used throughout the final rules we’re considering today. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Goossens H, Giesendorf AJ, Vandamme P, et al. (1995). [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW.Deatherage, Scott D., et al. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
25 Sep 2021, 2:36 pm
Minn. 2021) (noting how an individual's prior infection with COVID-19 "provide[d] him with some natural immunity and lessen[[ed] his risk of re-infection"). [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Kan. 2002) (acknowledging that most courts require a showing of RR > 2, but questioning their reasoning), aff’d, 356 F. 3d 1326 (10th Cir. 2004) Smith v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
Lackey was assigned to a case called Jones et al v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 6:29 pm
” IARC Monograph for Carbon Black, Titanium Dioxide & Talc, vol 93 (2010); Robert Baan, et al., “Carcinogenicity of carbon black, titanium dioxide, and talc,” 7 Lancet Oncology 295 (2006)5. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
Burrows v Smith (1709 Copyright Blog) (IPKat) UK MP’s frozen out of ACTA (Michael Geist) (IPKat) HMRC on the attack on image rights? [read post]
