Search for: "J J, et al. v. B J" Results 341 - 360 of 1,316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Judges derive insider trading violations from Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (together known as the “SEC’s antifraud provisions”), and are a “catchall” aimed at fraud, requiring some sort of “device, scheme or artifice to defraud” or some action, which would otherwise “operate as a fraud or deceit upon a person. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 8:50 am by Schachtman
If an expert witness believes that a chemical causes malformation A, this belief is not evidence that the chemical causes malformation B, unless malformation B can be shown to result from malformation A. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 6:22 am
 This is the question at the centre of Beyoncé Giselle Knowles-Carter, et al., v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 6:41 am by Paula Lombardi
  The post Ontario Superior Court of Justice Sets Aside Provisions of Legislation Cutting Toronto City Council in Half in City of Toronto et al v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 2:28 am by Roel van Woudenberg
" The English translation of this, "The appeal against the Decision ... is inadmissible", is incorrect, whereas the German translation is accurate: "Die Beschwerde ... gilt als nicht eingelegt. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
.), Montréal, 380827 31 20180212 F et 2433817Décision de : Me Nathalie Bousquet, greffière spécialeDate : 10 juillet 2018 LOUAGE DE CHOSES — bail d’habitation — fin et renouvellement du bail — renouvellement — fixation du loyer — modification d’une condition du bail — interdiction de cultiver et de consommer du cannabis — véhicule procédural —… [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 6:21 am by Brenna Gautam
Khalid Shaikh Mohammad et al. reconvened for pretrial proceedings, meeting in open session on July 23 and 25, and in closed sessions on July 24 and 26. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 7:58 am by Thorsten Bausch
The ruling of the CJEU brings to mind the test proposed by Warren J. in Eli Lilly v Human Genom Sciences [2014] EWHC 2404 (Pat) (18 July 2014)). [read post]