Search for: "Matter of Davis v Williams" Results 341 - 360 of 471
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2012, 1:00 am by Clara Altman
Charles, Oklahoma City: What the Investigation Missed-- And Why it Still Matters (William Morrow) ("The great value of "Oklahoma City" is not that it solves a mystery but that it reveals the limits, and vulnerabilities, of a no-expense-barred government investigation").And some food for thought: The New York Times has Dwight Garner's review of Tyler Cowen, An Economist Gets Lunch: New Rules for Everyday Foodies (Dutton). [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 12:07 am
This was not to say, however, that computer programs could not be the basis of infringement actions, citing Menashe v William Hill (supplying a program on a cd was found to be contributory infringement under section 60(2)), just that direct infringement in the UK on the basis of a computer program would no longer be possible. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Given Selikoff’s reputation and prestige in the field of asbestos health effects, and his role in helping pass the Williams-Steiger Act of 1969, we might wonder why no one has written a full-length biography. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The same day, the application for permission to appeal in the case of Ferdinand v MGN was withdrawn, the matter having been compromised as between the parties. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The Defendants are led by William Whatcott. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Joel R. Brandes
Such hearing shall only be held if:(i) the person is related to the child as described under paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of subdivision three of section four hundred fifty-eight-a of the social services law;(ii) the child has been temporarily removed under this part, or placed pursuant to section one thousand fifty-five of this article, and placed in non-relative foster care;(iii) the relative indicates a willingness to become the foster parent for such child and has not refused previously to be… [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am by Jeff Kosseff, Matthew Schafer
Reversing the jury’s verdict, Justice William Brennan, writing on behalf of the Court, adopted a new constitutional standard called actual malice. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
By now most Verdict readers have probably heard about Justice Scalia’s provocative comments at last week’s oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]