Search for: "Miller Construction, Inc." Results 341 - 360 of 528
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2013, 10:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Multi-Tech Sys., Inc., 357 F.3d 1340, 1350 (Fed. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am by Peter Mahler
Scholastic Inc. v Harris, 259 F3d 73, 85-86 [2d Cir 2001]; Johnson v Kennedy, 350 Mass 294, 298, 214 NE2d 276, 278 [1966]; Posner v Miller, 356 Mich 6, 9, 96 NW2d 110, 111-112 [1959]; Nicholes v Hunt, 273 Or 255, 261-262, 541 P2d 820, 823-824 [1975]; Willman v Beheler, 499 SW2d 770, 775 [Mo 1973]; Fisher v Fisher, 83 Cal App 2d 357, 360, 188 P2d 802, 804 [1948]). [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 7:59 am
Moore was the controller and bookkeeper for Dan Miller Inc., a construction company from 2003 to 2011. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:54 am by Shafik Bhalloo
  By Shafik Bhalloo* Like the mythical sasquatch, the Loch Ness monster, or the abominable snowman, most of us have heard of it and some of us have read about it, but never have we seen the remedy of reinstatement in section 79(2)(b) of the Employment Standards Act (the “Act”) actually occur. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:54 am by Shafik Bhalloo
  By Shafik Bhalloo* Like the mythical sasquatch, the Loch Ness monster, or the abominable snowman, most of us have heard of it and some of us have read about it, but never have we seen the remedy of reinstatement in section 79(2)(b) of the Employment Standards Act (the “Act”) actually occur. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
(6)(a) It is unlawful for any person to be in actual or constructive possession of a controlled substance unless such controlled substance was lawfully obtained from a practitioner or pursuant to a valid prescription or order of a practitioner while acting in the course of his professional practice or to be in actual or constructive possession of a controlled substance except as otherwise authorized by this chapter. [read post]