Search for: "Motion to Quash Subpoena"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,082
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am
Subpoenas Are Improper Some federal district courts view Rule 45 subpoenas as inappropriate discovery tools for parties[12] and persons under the control of parties. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
Counsel for the commenter entered an appearance seeking to quash the subpoena, but before the motion was ruled upon, the action was dismissed. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 6:45 pm
And finally, the majority notes that in the “rare[] event that an officer reasonably suspects that a hotel owner may tamper with the registry while [a] motion to quash is pending,” the officer may “guard the registry until the required hearing can occur, which ought not take long. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
The boss sought to quash the subpoena. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 4:52 am
One might hope that the Part 1 judge in the Southern District of New York will lean ever so slightly over his bench, peer down at the government’s counsel table, the one closest to the bench, and ask, “are you kidding me” in response to a motion to quash. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
X filed a motion to quash the subpoena. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 8:11 am
.): 1 Motion to Quash in 15-663 D. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 11:57 am
The Third Circuit ruled that the district court’s refusal to quash the subpoena was not an abuse of discretion. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 5:19 am
`Motions to compel and motions to quash a subpoena are both entrusted to the sound discretion of the district court. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:10 am
The Court noted it was “unwilling at this time . . . to quash the subpoenas at issue herein. [read post]
18 May 2015, 9:07 am
The speaker can file a motion seeking to quash the subpoena by showing that it seeks personal identifying information. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm
In such instances, a motion to quash is the appropriate remedy (see Terry D., supra). [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 1:53 pm
Recitation, as required by CPLR §2219(a), of the papers considered in the review of this motion by the for an order granting a protective order against plaintiff's subpoena and/or quashing the subpoena pursuant to CPLR §§2304, 2307 and 3103. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 11:19 am
But as best I can tell from the record, neither filed such motions to quash. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:23 am
In such instances, a motion to quash is the appropriate remedy (see Terry D., supra). [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 11:19 am
In order to determine whether OCSE is entitled to a protective order denying the disclosure of cancelled check records and financial data, the court should consider the same factors that would be considered on a motion for the issuance of a subpoenas duces tecum. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 7:16 am
Judge Forrest quashed the subpoenas as to the non-party activists. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 11:00 pm
» Related StoriesCourt Agrees with Plaintiffs, Orders Provision for Qualitative Sampling of Disputed Search Terms: eDiscovery Case LawPlaintiff’s Motion to Quash Subpoena of Text Messages Granted by Court: eDiscovery Case LawCourt Upholds Review of Taxable Costs by Clerk, Awards over $57,000: eDiscovery Case Law [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 11:00 pm
» Related StoriesJudge Peck Wades Back into the TAR Pits with ‘Da Silva Moore Revisited’: eDiscovery Case LawPlaintiff’s Motion to Quash Subpoena of Text Messages Granted by Court: eDiscovery Case LawCourt Upholds Review of Taxable Costs by Clerk, Awards over $57,000: eDiscovery Case Law [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 11:00 pm
: eDiscovery Best PracticesPlaintiff’s Motion to Quash Subpoena of Text Messages Granted by Court: eDiscovery Case Law [read post]
