Search for: "National By-products, Inc. v. the United States" Results 341 - 360 of 1,807
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm by Schachtman
The litigation is In re Taxotere (Docetaxel) Products Liability Litigation, a multi-district litigation (MDL) proceeding before Judge Jane Triche Milazzo, who sits on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. [read post]
A majority of fed cattle in the United States are sold to packing plants and processed into various beef products. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm by Robert Liles
  Notably, health spending will rise from a share of approximately 17.9% of the Gross National Product (GNP) to 19.4% during this time period.[1]  Understandably, Medicare and Medicaid program officials have ramped up their efforts to reign-in the costs of these government payor programs. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm by Robert Liles
  Notably, health spending will rise from a share of approximately 17.9% of the Gross National Product (GNP) to 19.4% during this time period.[1]  Understandably, Medicare and Medicaid program officials have ramped up their efforts to reign-in the costs of these government payor programs. [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:51 pm by Adam Rosenthal and Robert Foster
  Much of the guidance issued by OSHA during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has originated from guidance from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”). [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:04 pm by Guest Contributor
State and local governments instated facilities close and industry’s influence strikes again. [read post]
3 May 2020, 7:19 am by Eric Goldman
On appeal, Edwards argues that his conviction must be reversed and rendered because section 97-45-17 is unconstitutionally overbroad in violation of the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and unconstitutionally vague in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]