Search for: "STATE v. SY" Results 341 - 360 of 1,315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
19 May 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
An application for retirement benefits must be timely delivered to and received by the retirement system to be operative Biscardi v New York State and Local Retirement Sys., 2016 NY Slip Op 03238, Appellate Division, Third Department Valerie J. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:04 pm by Peter Vickery
Portland Natural Gas Transmission Sys. v. 19.2 Acres of Land in Haverhill, 195 F.Supp.2d 314 (D.Mass. 2002) aff'd 318 F.3d 279 (1st Cir. 2003).What does this mean for landowners in Berkshire and Franklin Counties whose properties the underground pipeline might cross? [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 1:54 am
  In DISMISSING the appeal, the Appellate Term, Second Department, stated: Here, defendant sought a protective order and the court denied its motion, affording plaintiff the full relief sought in opposition (see Atlantic Hudson Realty v Rhodes, 271 AD2d 558 [2000]). [read post]