Search for: "STATE v. WARNER" Results 341 - 360 of 1,300
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2018, 8:55 am
  Over to Katie, Rachel and Claire: "Last week, the UK Supreme Court held a 4-day hearing in Warner-Lambert v Actavis et al., the latest (perhaps last?) [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:29 am by Lindsay Griffiths
Penal Courts have also convicted to jail sentences those accused for state corruption. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:32 am by Ben
According to his website The Future Bones, his collaborations have included work with Sony Music, Warner Bros, and The Uprising Creative. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 10:59 am by Guest Author Adonis Hoffman, Esq.
Today, Judge Leon presides over yet another ground-breaking case with similar themes: United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 10:59 am by Guest Author Adonis Hoffman, Esq.
Today, Judge Leon presides over yet another ground-breaking case with similar themes: United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 1:00 am by Aimee Denholm
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 12:29 pm by Garrett Hinck
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck provided a primer on the merits issues in ACLU v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:29 am by Jordan Brunner
  ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Elena Chachko summarized Alyan v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 10:48 pm by GJEL
The Minnesota State Board of Investment led a group of 625,000 shareholders, bondholders, and institutions in the case against AOL Time Warner and the auditing firm Ernst & Young. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
Supreme Court case, Christie v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 5:49 am
However, it is unclear how far this right of integrity could be stretched in the context of performances; a restrictive approach has been followed in the context of authorial works (see Pasterfield v Denham [1999] FSR 168, Confetti Records v Warner Music UK Ltd [2003] EWHC 1274 (Ch), Harrison v Harrison [2010] FSR 25, compare with Tidy v Trustees of the Natural History Museum (1995) 39 IPR 501).It is not at all… [read post]