Search for: "Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd."
Results 341 - 360
of 488
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2011, 7:35 am
Samsung came in second with 4,551 patent (+26%) Microsoft is third with 3,094 (+6.5%). [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:11 am
Emine Technology Co., Ltd. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 3:29 pm
In the Order, ALJ Essex granted a joint motion filed by Complainant BTG International and Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Apple, Inc., ASUStek Computer, Inc., ASUS Computer International, Inc., Dell Inc., Lenovo (United States) Inc., Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:24 am
Samsung Electronics Co. et al. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:24 am
Samsung Electronics Co. et al. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 12:52 pm
In Order No. 44, ALJ Charneski granted Complainant Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 12:13 pm
" About Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 9:06 am
The Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Shanghai Lenovo Electronic Co. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:50 pm
The Respondents are Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electro-Mechanics America, Inc. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:34 am
Co., Ltd. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:29 am
(RIMM), and last winter scored significant royalty deals with Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 8:24 am
No. 337-TA-685) granting Complainant Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. [read post]
ALJ Charneski Terminates Investigation As To Alpine Electronics In Certain Flash Memory (337-TA-685)
10 Dec 2010, 4:19 pm
According to the Order, Complainant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. filed a motion to withdraw the allegations in the complaint against Alpine. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:13 pm
In support of its motion, Spansion relied upon the deposition testimony of Complainant Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:19 pm
No. 337-TA-685) denying Complainant Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am
No. 337-TA-685) denying motions by Respondents Spansion, Inc. and Spansion LLC’s (collectively, “Spansion”) and Complainant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 7:45 pm
No. 337-TA-685) granting Complainant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 5:34 pm
Lead Networks Domains Pvt., Ltd (Property, intangible) [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:06 pm
” In opposition, Complainant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm
In the Order, ALJ Rogers granted a joint motion filed by Complainant STC.UNM and Respondent Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. to terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement. [read post]
