Search for: "State of Cal. v. Super. Ct."
Results 341 - 360
of 400
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
Ct. at 1578-79. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 6:09 am
Cal. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 11:52 am
CGC-20-584402 (Cal Super. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 8:41 am
Cal. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:00 am
Cal. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
State court analogues to these rules replicated the debate in state courts around the country. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:24 am
Cal. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 9:42 am
Ct. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 6:49 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Cir. 2019); United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
One New Jersey appellate court upheld the disqualification of an expert witness who had worked for the State of New Jersey on a case that involved confidential disclosures by the State’s lawyers and its agencies, which disclosures were necessarily involved in the expert witness’s subsequent retention by the State’s adversary in a different case.[10] This decision, like most in this area, turned on a close analysis of the facts and circumstances of the… [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Feb. 6, 2009) ("Guinan I"), and Guinan v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 7:58 am
Cal, San Diego County, California) Marty v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 2:01 pm
Ct. for King Cty.1987); Franze v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 12:38 pm
Ct. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:32 am
See Gitter v Gitter, 396 F.3d 124 (2d Cir.); Feder v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 4:26 pm
Ct. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
Ct. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
