Search for: "State v. Armstrong"
Results 341 - 360
of 684
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2014, 7:50 am
As the Supreme Court famously put it in Armstrong v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:46 am
” United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:06 am
Applying the Doctrine of Primary JurisdictionMarsico v Armstrong, 2013 NY Slip Op 07487, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentEducation Law §2510(2) provides that “Whenever a board of education abolishes a position under this chapter, the services of the teacher having the least seniority in the system within the tenure of the position abolished shall be discontinued [emphasis supplied]. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Applying the Doctrine of Primary JurisdictionMarsico v Armstrong, 2013 NY Slip Op 07487, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentEducation Law §2510(2) provides that “Whenever a board of education abolishes a position under this chapter, the services of the teacher having the least seniority in the system within the tenure of the position abolished shall be discontinued [emphasis supplied]. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 5:11 pm
Armstrong (1912), 32 N.Z.L.R. 409 at 425 (C.A.). [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:06 am
The case, Bond v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:59 pm
Today’s oral argument in Bond v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 9:54 am
The argument in Bond v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:55 am
Related posts:Armstrong v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 10:06 pm
[Click here to see the rest of this post] Found on Related articles Medical Device Litigation: Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 12:29 pm
Landis v. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 11:04 am
BeckonEmployee Blogging RisksEmployee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim -- Barnett v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm
Stutzman v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 5:19 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 8:16 am
Armstrong and Timothy P. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
(As it is an ongoing case, all apparent statements of fact are as set out in the judgment and should be taken as being untested at trial).Leicester Housing Association Ltd v Armstrong. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
(As it is an ongoing case, all apparent statements of fact are as set out in the judgment and should be taken as being untested at trial).Leicester Housing Association Ltd v Armstrong. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
This embraces a pledge that “neither party shall do anything which will have the effect of destroying or injuring the right of the other party to receive the fruits of the contract” (Kirke La Shelle Co. v Armstrong Co., 263 N.Y. 79, 87). [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 2:15 pm
State, No. 103,915 (Douglass)K.S.A. 60-1507 appeal (petition for review)Jessica R. [read post]
